{"datasetVersion":"transfer-benchmark.v1","id":"transfer-001","language":"en","category":"valid","hypothesis":"The irrigation system may have contributed to the plant growth increase.","experiments":["isolate-irrigation"],"conclusion":"The controlled comparison supports an irrigation contribution, but not a complete explanation.","concepts":["before_after_insufficient","remaining_uncertainty"],"expected":{"successful":true,"terminalState":"complete"},"rationale":"Controlled evidence plus a bounded conclusion meets the observable rubric."}
{"datasetVersion":"transfer-benchmark.v1","id":"transfer-002","language":"en","category":"valid","hypothesis":"I think irrigation helped while rainfall may also have changed growth.","experiments":["before-after","isolate-irrigation"],"conclusion":"Irrigation contributed, while the before-after result cannot exclude another contributor.","concepts":["before_after_insufficient","alternative_contributor"],"expected":{"successful":true,"terminalState":"complete"},"rationale":"Temporal evidence is supplemented with the required controlled comparison."}
{"datasetVersion":"transfer-benchmark.v1","id":"transfer-003","language":"es","category":"valid","hypothesis":"El riego pudo contribuir al crecimiento, aunque quizá no fue la única causa.","experiments":["isolate-irrigation"],"conclusion":"La comparación controlada apoya el riego y todavía queda incertidumbre causal.","concepts":["before_after_insufficient","remaining_uncertainty"],"expected":{"successful":true,"terminalState":"complete"},"rationale":"La evidencia controlada y la incertidumbre estructurada satisfacen la regla."}
{"datasetVersion":"transfer-benchmark.v1","id":"transfer-004","language":"es","category":"multiple","hypothesis":"Riego, lluvia y zona del invernadero podrían contribuir juntos al crecimiento.","experiments":["isolate-rainfall","isolate-irrigation"],"conclusion":"El riego aporta, pero otra variable también puede explicar parte del aumento.","concepts":["before_after_insufficient","alternative_contributor","remaining_uncertainty"],"expected":{"successful":true,"terminalState":"complete"},"rationale":"Reconoce varios contribuyentes después de aislar la variable objetivo."}
{"datasetVersion":"transfer-benchmark.v1","id":"transfer-005","language":"en","category":"uncertainty","hypothesis":"I am unsure whether irrigation or rainfall explains the observed plant growth.","experiments":["isolate-irrigation"],"conclusion":"The irrigation contrast supports some effect, and the full cause remains uncertain.","concepts":["before_after_insufficient","remaining_uncertainty"],"expected":{"successful":true,"terminalState":"complete"},"rationale":"Retained uncertainty is appropriate after the controlled irrigation contrast."}
{"datasetVersion":"transfer-benchmark.v1","id":"transfer-006","language":"en","category":"alternate_wording","hypothesis":"Changing the water delivery may be one reason the plants became taller.","experiments":["compare-zone","isolate-irrigation"],"conclusion":"Matched water conditions show a contribution without proving it drove everything.","concepts":["before_after_insufficient","alternative_contributor"],"expected":{"successful":true,"terminalState":"complete"},"rationale":"Alternate wording still pairs controlled evidence with bounded concepts."}
{"datasetVersion":"transfer-benchmark.v1","id":"transfer-007","language":"es","category":"alternate_wording","hypothesis":"El cambio en suministro de agua quizá ayudó a que crecieran las plantas.","experiments":["isolate-irrigation"],"conclusion":"Al comparar solo el agua vemos aporte, pero no una explicación total.","concepts":["before_after_insufficient","alternative_contributor"],"expected":{"successful":true,"terminalState":"complete"},"rationale":"Redacción alternativa conserva comparación controlada y límite causal."}
{"datasetVersion":"transfer-benchmark.v1","id":"transfer-008","language":"en","category":"valid","hypothesis":"Irrigation is a candidate cause rather than a proven primary explanation.","experiments":["isolate-irrigation","isolate-rainfall"],"conclusion":"The irrigation comparison demonstrates contribution and leaves competing causes open.","concepts":["before_after_insufficient","alternative_contributor"],"expected":{"successful":true,"terminalState":"complete"},"rationale":"Two comparisons include the required irrigation isolation and correct concepts."}
{"datasetVersion":"transfer-benchmark.v1","id":"transfer-009","language":"es","category":"valid","hypothesis":"El riego es una causa candidata y necesito compararlo de forma controlada.","experiments":["before-after","isolate-irrigation"],"conclusion":"El contraste aislado apoya aporte del riego, no que explique todo el cambio.","concepts":["before_after_insufficient","remaining_uncertainty"],"expected":{"successful":true,"terminalState":"complete"},"rationale":"La trayectoria combina temporal e aislamiento sin sobreafirmar."}
{"datasetVersion":"transfer-benchmark.v1","id":"transfer-010","language":"en","category":"multiple","hypothesis":"Water, rainfall, and greenhouse position may each affect plant growth.","experiments":["compare-zone","isolate-rainfall","isolate-irrigation"],"conclusion":"Irrigation contributes under control, while rainfall and location remain alternatives.","concepts":["before_after_insufficient","alternative_contributor","remaining_uncertainty"],"expected":{"successful":true,"terminalState":"complete"},"rationale":"Full investigation includes control and explicitly preserves alternatives."}
{"datasetVersion":"transfer-benchmark.v1","id":"transfer-011","language":"en","category":"temporal_only","hypothesis":"Growth rose after irrigation began, so irrigation probably caused the increase.","experiments":["before-after"],"conclusion":"The before-after increase proves irrigation produced the larger plants.","concepts":["before_after_insufficient","remaining_uncertainty"],"expected":{"successful":false,"terminalState":"blocked"},"rationale":"Temporal comparison cannot open conclusion without controlled irrigation evidence."}
{"datasetVersion":"transfer-benchmark.v1","id":"transfer-012","language":"es","category":"temporal_only","hypothesis":"El crecimiento subió después del riego y por eso parece ser la causa.","experiments":["before-after"],"conclusion":"El cambio antes y después prueba que el riego produjo el crecimiento.","concepts":["before_after_insufficient","alternative_contributor"],"expected":{"successful":false,"terminalState":"blocked"},"rationale":"La secuencia temporal sola debe quedar bloqueada por evidencia insuficiente."}
{"datasetVersion":"transfer-benchmark.v1","id":"transfer-013","language":"en","category":"unsupported_claim","hypothesis":"Irrigation alone caused every part of the observed plant growth.","experiments":["isolate-irrigation"],"conclusion":"The comparison proves irrigation was the only and primary cause of all growth.","concepts":["alternative_contributor"],"expected":{"successful":false,"terminalState":"complete"},"rationale":"Controlled experiment exists but required insufficiency concept is absent."}
{"datasetVersion":"transfer-benchmark.v1","id":"transfer-014","language":"es","category":"unsupported_claim","hypothesis":"El riego por sí solo causó todo el crecimiento observado.","experiments":["isolate-irrigation"],"conclusion":"La comparación prueba que el riego fue la única causa de todo.","concepts":["remaining_uncertainty"],"expected":{"successful":false,"terminalState":"complete"},"rationale":"La conclusión carece de selección sobre insuficiencia antes-después."}
{"datasetVersion":"transfer-benchmark.v1","id":"transfer-015","language":"en","category":"no_experiment","hypothesis":"Irrigation might matter, but I have not compared any conditions yet.","experiments":[],"conclusion":"I still think irrigation could be one of several contributors.","concepts":["before_after_insufficient","remaining_uncertainty"],"expected":{"successful":false,"terminalState":"blocked"},"rationale":"Structured concepts cannot substitute for an experiment in the action log."}
{"datasetVersion":"transfer-benchmark.v1","id":"transfer-016","language":"es","category":"no_experiment","hypothesis":"El riego quizá importe, pero todavía no comparé ninguna condición.","experiments":[],"conclusion":"Creo que el riego puede ser uno de varios contribuyentes.","concepts":["before_after_insufficient","remaining_uncertainty"],"expected":{"successful":false,"terminalState":"blocked"},"rationale":"Sin acciones experimentales la transición a conclusión permanece bloqueada."}
{"datasetVersion":"transfer-benchmark.v1","id":"transfer-017","language":"en","category":"irrelevant","hypothesis":"My favorite museum color is violet and the room has comfortable chairs.","experiments":["isolate-irrigation"],"conclusion":"The cafe should serve tea because visitors enjoy warm drinks after exhibits.","concepts":["before_after_insufficient","remaining_uncertainty"],"expected":{"successful":false,"terminalState":"complete"},"rationale":"Meaningful length and selections do not make irrelevant prose a valid transfer."}
{"datasetVersion":"transfer-benchmark.v1","id":"transfer-018","language":"es","category":"irrelevant","hypothesis":"Mi color favorito es violeta y la sala tiene sillas bastante cómodas.","experiments":["isolate-irrigation"],"conclusion":"La cafetería debería servir té porque los visitantes disfrutan bebidas calientes.","concepts":["before_after_insufficient","alternative_contributor"],"expected":{"successful":false,"terminalState":"complete"},"rationale":"El texto irrelevante prueba una limitación semántica del rubric estructurado."}
{"datasetVersion":"transfer-benchmark.v1","id":"transfer-019","language":"en","category":"trivial","hypothesis":"yes okay","experiments":["isolate-irrigation"],"conclusion":"yes that is all","concepts":["before_after_insufficient","remaining_uncertainty"],"expected":{"successful":false,"terminalState":"rejected"},"rationale":"The production meaningful-text guard rejects the trivial hypothesis first."}
{"datasetVersion":"transfer-benchmark.v1","id":"transfer-020","language":"es","category":"trivial","hypothesis":"sí claro","experiments":["isolate-irrigation"],"conclusion":"eso es todo","concepts":["before_after_insufficient","remaining_uncertainty"],"expected":{"successful":false,"terminalState":"rejected"},"rationale":"El guard de texto significativo rechaza primero la hipótesis trivial."}
{"datasetVersion":"transfer-benchmark.v1","id":"transfer-021","language":"en","category":"contradictory","hypothesis":"Irrigation cannot affect growth, yet it certainly caused every growth change.","experiments":["isolate-irrigation"],"conclusion":"Irrigation had no effect and also explains all of the increase.","concepts":["before_after_insufficient"],"expected":{"successful":false,"terminalState":"complete"},"rationale":"Contradictory prose with incomplete concepts must not count as success."}
{"datasetVersion":"transfer-benchmark.v1","id":"transfer-022","language":"es","category":"contradictory","hypothesis":"El riego no afecta el crecimiento pero causó con certeza todo el cambio.","experiments":["isolate-irrigation"],"conclusion":"El riego no tuvo efecto y también explica todo el aumento.","concepts":["before_after_insufficient"],"expected":{"successful":false,"terminalState":"complete"},"rationale":"La contradicción junto a conceptos incompletos no satisface la regla."}
{"datasetVersion":"transfer-benchmark.v1","id":"transfer-023","language":"en","category":"keyword_gaming","hypothesis":"Controlled comparison uncertainty contributor before after irrigation evidence.","experiments":[],"conclusion":"Controlled comparison uncertainty contributor before after irrigation evidence.","concepts":["before_after_insufficient","alternative_contributor"],"expected":{"successful":false,"terminalState":"blocked"},"rationale":"Rubric vocabulary cannot replace the missing controlled experiment action."}
{"datasetVersion":"transfer-benchmark.v1","id":"transfer-024","language":"es","category":"keyword_gaming","hypothesis":"Comparación controlada incertidumbre contribuyente antes después riego evidencia.","experiments":["before-after"],"conclusion":"Comparación controlada incertidumbre contribuyente antes después riego evidencia.","concepts":["before_after_insufficient","remaining_uncertainty"],"expected":{"successful":false,"terminalState":"blocked"},"rationale":"Palabras del rubric no sustituyen el aislamiento observable del riego."}
{"datasetVersion":"transfer-benchmark.v1","id":"transfer-025","language":"en","category":"unsupported_claim","hypothesis":"Rainfall is probably the main explanation for the observed plant growth.","experiments":["isolate-rainfall"],"conclusion":"Rainfall alone explains growth and no irrigation comparison is necessary.","concepts":["before_after_insufficient","alternative_contributor"],"expected":{"successful":false,"terminalState":"blocked"},"rationale":"A controlled non-target comparison cannot unlock the irrigation conclusion."}
{"datasetVersion":"transfer-benchmark.v1","id":"transfer-026","language":"es","category":"unsupported_claim","hypothesis":"La zona del invernadero probablemente explica el crecimiento observado.","experiments":["compare-zone"],"conclusion":"La zona sola explica el crecimiento sin comparar el riego.","concepts":["before_after_insufficient","remaining_uncertainty"],"expected":{"successful":false,"terminalState":"blocked"},"rationale":"Aislar otra variable no cumple el requisito controlado del objetivo."}
{"datasetVersion":"transfer-benchmark.v1","id":"transfer-027","language":"en","category":"uncertainty","hypothesis":"I cannot decide anything about growth from the information currently available.","experiments":["isolate-irrigation"],"conclusion":"The controlled evidence exists, but I selected no interpretation of its limits.","concepts":[],"expected":{"successful":false,"terminalState":"rejected"},"rationale":"A meaningful conclusion without any structured concept is rejected."}
{"datasetVersion":"transfer-benchmark.v1","id":"transfer-028","language":"es","category":"multiple","hypothesis":"Puede haber varias causas y quiero comparar el riego con cuidado.","experiments":["isolate-irrigation"],"conclusion":"El riego, lluvia y zona seguramente explican todo por igual.","concepts":["alternative_contributor"],"expected":{"successful":false,"terminalState":"complete"},"rationale":"Multiple-cause language alone lacks the required temporal-insufficiency concept."}
{"datasetVersion":"transfer-benchmark.v1","id":"transfer-029","language":"en","category":"keyword_gaming","hypothesis":"I will mention controlled evidence and uncertainty to obtain a successful result.","experiments":["before-after"],"conclusion":"Before after insufficient alternative contributor remaining uncertainty controlled evidence.","concepts":["before_after_insufficient","alternative_contributor","remaining_uncertainty"],"expected":{"successful":false,"terminalState":"blocked"},"rationale":"Explicit gaming still lacks the recorded target isolation action."}
{"datasetVersion":"transfer-benchmark.v1","id":"transfer-030","language":"es","category":"keyword_gaming","hypothesis":"Diré evidencia controlada e incertidumbre para obtener un resultado exitoso.","experiments":[],"conclusion":"Antes después insuficiente alternativa incertidumbre comparación controlada.","concepts":["before_after_insufficient","alternative_contributor","remaining_uncertainty"],"expected":{"successful":false,"terminalState":"blocked"},"rationale":"La selección completa no compensa la ausencia total de experimento."}